<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why We Should Root for Bing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.verticalmeasures.com/search-optimization/why-we-should-root-for-bing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.verticalmeasures.com/search-optimization/why-we-should-root-for-bing/</link>
	<description>Intelligent Internet Marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 04:41:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris Lang</title>
		<link>http://www.verticalmeasures.com/search-optimization/why-we-should-root-for-bing/comment-page-1/#comment-1934</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Lang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.verticalmeasures.com/?p=2449#comment-1934</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BING, or (But It&#039;s Not Google) has one flaw in it&#039;s marketing:

Google is not broken, there is nothing wrong with the search results we get.

If Google was the only game in town and it did not return to me what I want, then BING would have a chance with me.

With Google&#039;s new filtering by date, I can not only get great results from my searches but I can get the latest AND best articles.

When I search for Google Friend Connect to see what my competition is writing on the subject I can filter the results to the latest published and lots more.

That way I don&#039;t get the TechCrunch article from May 2009. I get the latest articles published from the best sites.

Try a search for a tech article. You will get the same top 10 sites like TechCrunch, Mashable, SearchEngineLand and ReadWriteWeb and most of the articles will be from last year.

Now in the same search click &quot;show options&quot; and get a search filtered by date.

Hence I have no reason to even look at BING.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BING, or (But It&#8217;s Not Google) has one flaw in it&#8217;s marketing:</p>
<p>Google is not broken, there is nothing wrong with the search results we get.</p>
<p>If Google was the only game in town and it did not return to me what I want, then BING would have a chance with me.</p>
<p>With Google&#8217;s new filtering by date, I can not only get great results from my searches but I can get the latest AND best articles.</p>
<p>When I search for Google Friend Connect to see what my competition is writing on the subject I can filter the results to the latest published and lots more.</p>
<p>That way I don&#8217;t get the TechCrunch article from May 2009. I get the latest articles published from the best sites.</p>
<p>Try a search for a tech article. You will get the same top 10 sites like TechCrunch, Mashable, SearchEngineLand and ReadWriteWeb and most of the articles will be from last year.</p>
<p>Now in the same search click &#8220;show options&#8221; and get a search filtered by date.</p>
<p>Hence I have no reason to even look at BING.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Lang</title>
		<link>http://www.verticalmeasures.com/search-optimization/why-we-should-root-for-bing/comment-page-1/#comment-6916</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Lang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.verticalmeasures.com/?p=2449#comment-6916</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BING, or (But It&#039;s Not Google) has one flaw in it&#039;s marketing:

Google is not broken, there is nothing wrong with the search results we get.

If Google was the only game in town and it did not return to me what I want, then BING would have a chance with me.

With Google&#039;s new filtering by date, I can not only get great results from my searches but I can get the latest AND best articles.

When I search for Google Friend Connect to see what my competition is writing on the subject I can filter the results to the latest published and lots more.

That way I don&#039;t get the TechCrunch article from May 2009. I get the latest articles published from the best sites.

Try a search for a tech article. You will get the same top 10 sites like TechCrunch, Mashable, SearchEngineLand and ReadWriteWeb and most of the articles will be from last year.

Now in the same search click &quot;show options&quot; and get a search filtered by date.

Hence I have no reason to even look at BING.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BING, or (But It&#8217;s Not Google) has one flaw in it&#8217;s marketing:</p>
<p>Google is not broken, there is nothing wrong with the search results we get.</p>
<p>If Google was the only game in town and it did not return to me what I want, then BING would have a chance with me.</p>
<p>With Google&#8217;s new filtering by date, I can not only get great results from my searches but I can get the latest AND best articles.</p>
<p>When I search for Google Friend Connect to see what my competition is writing on the subject I can filter the results to the latest published and lots more.</p>
<p>That way I don&#8217;t get the TechCrunch article from May 2009. I get the latest articles published from the best sites.</p>
<p>Try a search for a tech article. You will get the same top 10 sites like TechCrunch, Mashable, SearchEngineLand and ReadWriteWeb and most of the articles will be from last year.</p>
<p>Now in the same search click &#8220;show options&#8221; and get a search filtered by date.</p>
<p>Hence I have no reason to even look at BING.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucy Griffiths</title>
		<link>http://www.verticalmeasures.com/search-optimization/why-we-should-root-for-bing/comment-page-1/#comment-1924</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucy Griffiths</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 10:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.verticalmeasures.com/?p=2449#comment-1924</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Until the initial hype of Bing has calmed down it will be difficult to see how things will turn out. If Bing does succeed then that will be great to see some real competition for Google, but I guess searchers will have the final say on that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Until the initial hype of Bing has calmed down it will be difficult to see how things will turn out. If Bing does succeed then that will be great to see some real competition for Google, but I guess searchers will have the final say on that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucy Griffiths</title>
		<link>http://www.verticalmeasures.com/search-optimization/why-we-should-root-for-bing/comment-page-1/#comment-6915</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucy Griffiths</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 10:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.verticalmeasures.com/?p=2449#comment-6915</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Until the initial hype of Bing has calmed down it will be difficult to see how things will turn out. If Bing does succeed then that will be great to see some real competition for Google, but I guess searchers will have the final say on that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Until the initial hype of Bing has calmed down it will be difficult to see how things will turn out. If Bing does succeed then that will be great to see some real competition for Google, but I guess searchers will have the final say on that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Bentz</title>
		<link>http://www.verticalmeasures.com/search-optimization/why-we-should-root-for-bing/comment-page-1/#comment-1903</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bentz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 11:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.verticalmeasures.com/?p=2449#comment-1903</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah, don&#039;t get me wrong, I love the idea of Google having a legitimate competitor (or two). But even when Microsoft sees an uptick in search volume - what they get still pales in comparison to the daily numbers Google gets. While it&#039;s great that Microsoft is interested in spending to compete, it very well could be for naught. I know for me, personally, that while I watch Microsoft rankings for my clients, I don&#039;t use Bing to search.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, don&#8217;t get me wrong, I love the idea of Google having a legitimate competitor (or two). But even when Microsoft sees an uptick in search volume &#8211; what they get still pales in comparison to the daily numbers Google gets. While it&#8217;s great that Microsoft is interested in spending to compete, it very well could be for naught. I know for me, personally, that while I watch Microsoft rankings for my clients, I don&#8217;t use Bing to search.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
