<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wave and Bing: The Highlights</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.verticalmeasures.com/search-optimization/wave-and-bing-the-highlights/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.verticalmeasures.com/search-optimization/wave-and-bing-the-highlights/</link>
	<description>Intelligent Internet Marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 20:58:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ralph</title>
		<link>http://www.verticalmeasures.com/search-optimization/wave-and-bing-the-highlights/comment-page-1/#comment-1773</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:31:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.verticalmeasures.com/?p=2105#comment-1773</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I personally like what &lt;a href=&quot;http://sethgodin.typepad.com/seths_blog/2009/05/the-next-google.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Seth Godin&lt;/a&gt; had to say about Bing. To summarize: Microsoft is trying to become the next Google, without realizing that there&#039;s already a next Google out there; and it&#039;s called Google.

Case in point: Wave. This is just more proof that Google will continue to innovate while Microsoft is just trying to catch up.  And come on, let&#039;s be honest...if Microsoft comes up with something really wonderful for Bing, how long do you think it will take Google or other search engines to emulate it?  

$100 million for Bing is a complete waste. They&#039;d be better off building an iPhone app. It&#039;d cost less than Bing and it might actually be the most profitable venture Microsoft has undertaken in 5 years since the iphone is so popular...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally like what <a href="http://sethgodin.typepad.com/seths_blog/2009/05/the-next-google.html" rel="nofollow">Seth Godin</a> had to say about Bing. To summarize: Microsoft is trying to become the next Google, without realizing that there&#8217;s already a next Google out there; and it&#8217;s called Google.</p>
<p>Case in point: Wave. This is just more proof that Google will continue to innovate while Microsoft is just trying to catch up.  And come on, let&#8217;s be honest&#8230;if Microsoft comes up with something really wonderful for Bing, how long do you think it will take Google or other search engines to emulate it?  </p>
<p>$100 million for Bing is a complete waste. They&#8217;d be better off building an iPhone app. It&#8217;d cost less than Bing and it might actually be the most profitable venture Microsoft has undertaken in 5 years since the iphone is so popular&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ralph</title>
		<link>http://www.verticalmeasures.com/search-optimization/wave-and-bing-the-highlights/comment-page-1/#comment-6894</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.verticalmeasures.com/?p=2105#comment-6894</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I personally like what &lt;a href=&quot;http://sethgodin.typepad.com/seths_blog/2009/05/the-next-google.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Seth Godin&lt;/a&gt; had to say about Bing. To summarize: Microsoft is trying to become the next Google, without realizing that there&#039;s already a next Google out there; and it&#039;s called Google.

Case in point: Wave. This is just more proof that Google will continue to innovate while Microsoft is just trying to catch up.  And come on, let&#039;s be honest...if Microsoft comes up with something really wonderful for Bing, how long do you think it will take Google or other search engines to emulate it?  

$100 million for Bing is a complete waste. They&#039;d be better off building an iPhone app. It&#039;d cost less than Bing and it might actually be the most profitable venture Microsoft has undertaken in 5 years since the iphone is so popular...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally like what <a href="http://sethgodin.typepad.com/seths_blog/2009/05/the-next-google.html" rel="nofollow">Seth Godin</a> had to say about Bing. To summarize: Microsoft is trying to become the next Google, without realizing that there&#8217;s already a next Google out there; and it&#8217;s called Google.</p>
<p>Case in point: Wave. This is just more proof that Google will continue to innovate while Microsoft is just trying to catch up.  And come on, let&#8217;s be honest&#8230;if Microsoft comes up with something really wonderful for Bing, how long do you think it will take Google or other search engines to emulate it?  </p>
<p>$100 million for Bing is a complete waste. They&#8217;d be better off building an iPhone app. It&#8217;d cost less than Bing and it might actually be the most profitable venture Microsoft has undertaken in 5 years since the iphone is so popular&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
