<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Link Building with Bing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.verticalmeasures.com/link-building/link-building-with-bing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.verticalmeasures.com/link-building/link-building-with-bing/</link>
	<description>Intelligent Internet Marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 16:33:37 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: aimClear&#8217;s 2009 Daily Training Link Library &#187; aimClear Search Marketing Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.verticalmeasures.com/link-building/link-building-with-bing/comment-page-1/#comment-3140</link>
		<dc:creator>aimClear&#8217;s 2009 Daily Training Link Library &#187; aimClear Search Marketing Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 22:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.verticalmeasures.com/?p=2150#comment-3140</guid>
		<description>[...] Link Building with Bing, Vertical Measures [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Link Building with Bing, Vertical Measures [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pep- Scarpe da Ginnastica</title>
		<link>http://www.verticalmeasures.com/link-building/link-building-with-bing/comment-page-1/#comment-1849</link>
		<dc:creator>Pep- Scarpe da Ginnastica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 10:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.verticalmeasures.com/?p=2150#comment-1849</guid>
		<description>I have tried bing for a couple of days. I&#039;m not impressed, but i am the type that don&#039;t like over-hyped novelties. Maybe when no one will be talking about it anymore i will look at it better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have tried bing for a couple of days. I&#8217;m not impressed, but i am the type that don&#8217;t like over-hyped novelties. Maybe when no one will be talking about it anymore i will look at it better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melayu Boleh</title>
		<link>http://www.verticalmeasures.com/link-building/link-building-with-bing/comment-page-1/#comment-1779</link>
		<dc:creator>Melayu Boleh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 17:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.verticalmeasures.com/?p=2150#comment-1779</guid>
		<description>Bing still got a popular view.it has became popular.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bing still got a popular view.it has became popular.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig - Internet marketing</title>
		<link>http://www.verticalmeasures.com/link-building/link-building-with-bing/comment-page-1/#comment-1776</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig - Internet marketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 02:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.verticalmeasures.com/?p=2150#comment-1776</guid>
		<description>I sure hope you are wrong about the big players dominating. It would be a real throwback to the 70s.

Especially bad since so many of the biggies don&#039;t runtheir businesses very well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I sure hope you are wrong about the big players dominating. It would be a real throwback to the 70s.</p>
<p>Especially bad since so many of the biggies don&#8217;t runtheir businesses very well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daryl Clark</title>
		<link>http://www.verticalmeasures.com/link-building/link-building-with-bing/comment-page-1/#comment-1775</link>
		<dc:creator>Daryl Clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 17:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.verticalmeasures.com/?p=2150#comment-1775</guid>
		<description>I have found the results at Bing to be poor vs. that of Google and Yahoo. Although they have improved the interface, it is relevant results that count. After conducting over 50 different unrelated searches, I found About.com had multiple top ten rankings for the same phrase. 

Some rankings in the top 20 had &quot;home&quot; as the HTML page title. Certainly with 800,000 possible results, they can offer more relevant results than &quot;home&quot;. 

I believe after the advertising hype is over, BING will settle in right where Live was in terms of market share. After all, it really is search results that count, not hype.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have found the results at Bing to be poor vs. that of Google and Yahoo. Although they have improved the interface, it is relevant results that count. After conducting over 50 different unrelated searches, I found About.com had multiple top ten rankings for the same phrase. </p>
<p>Some rankings in the top 20 had &#8220;home&#8221; as the HTML page title. Certainly with 800,000 possible results, they can offer more relevant results than &#8220;home&#8221;. </p>
<p>I believe after the advertising hype is over, BING will settle in right where Live was in terms of market share. After all, it really is search results that count, not hype.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
