<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 7 Criteria to Consider When Building Links</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.verticalmeasures.com/link-building/7-criteria-to-consider-when-building-links/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.verticalmeasures.com/link-building/7-criteria-to-consider-when-building-links/</link>
	<description>Intelligent Internet Marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 14:11:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kelli Brown</title>
		<link>http://www.verticalmeasures.com/link-building/7-criteria-to-consider-when-building-links/comment-page-1/#comment-80698</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelli Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 09:39:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.verticalmeasures.com/?p=11398#comment-80698</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Mike - great article, and apologies for being late to the comment party.
I agree with all of your criteria and think they are great benchmarks for link building, but I&#039;m interested in how you chose the numbers for PR and DA/PA. I guess I was surprised to see something as low as a PR of 2 as a good thing, and ditto on DA/PA of 20. Are we setting our link building sights too high? I&#039;m wondering if we&#039;re being too snobby in our link building efforts. Thanks!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mike &#8211; great article, and apologies for being late to the comment party.<br />
I agree with all of your criteria and think they are great benchmarks for link building, but I&#8217;m interested in how you chose the numbers for PR and DA/PA. I guess I was surprised to see something as low as a PR of 2 as a good thing, and ditto on DA/PA of 20. Are we setting our link building sights too high? I&#8217;m wondering if we&#8217;re being too snobby in our link building efforts. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SearchCap: The Day In Search, October 31, 2011 &#124; Market 7</title>
		<link>http://www.verticalmeasures.com/link-building/7-criteria-to-consider-when-building-links/comment-page-1/#comment-79602</link>
		<dc:creator>SearchCap: The Day In Search, October 31, 2011 &#124; Market 7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2011 13:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.verticalmeasures.com/?p=11398#comment-79602</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] 7 Criteria to Consider When Building Links, Vertical Measures [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 7 Criteria to Consider When Building Links, Vertical Measures [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gyi Tsakalakis</title>
		<link>http://www.verticalmeasures.com/link-building/7-criteria-to-consider-when-building-links/comment-page-1/#comment-78747</link>
		<dc:creator>Gyi Tsakalakis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 18:55:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.verticalmeasures.com/?p=11398#comment-78747</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for this Mike. Good reminder. I also concur on &#039;nofollow&#039;. If they&#039;re in GWMT, Google&#039;s keeping track.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this Mike. Good reminder. I also concur on &#8216;nofollow&#8217;. If they&#8217;re in GWMT, Google&#8217;s keeping track.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Len</title>
		<link>http://www.verticalmeasures.com/link-building/7-criteria-to-consider-when-building-links/comment-page-1/#comment-78484</link>
		<dc:creator>Len</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 17:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.verticalmeasures.com/?p=11398#comment-78484</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve been following your blog posts via linked in for some time now.  I am just learning SEO and find everything you guys are saying to be of value.  I have been building .edu links via responding to peoples blogs where I have found information related to my real estate topic.  Question to you is that by responding on VM&#039;s blog here do I gain SEO juice from VM as well?  

I have also heard that one should put their keyword in place of their name so that that keyword is linked to the site.  Is that true? I don&#039;t do that cause it seems like that is sort of gaming Google a bit and that most admin&#039;s would just delete the comment because they see that you are gaming the system.  What are your thoughts?  

 Like I said, I am new and just learning so any insight you could provide would be helpful.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been following your blog posts via linked in for some time now.  I am just learning SEO and find everything you guys are saying to be of value.  I have been building .edu links via responding to peoples blogs where I have found information related to my real estate topic.  Question to you is that by responding on VM&#8217;s blog here do I gain SEO juice from VM as well?  </p>
<p>I have also heard that one should put their keyword in place of their name so that that keyword is linked to the site.  Is that true? I don&#8217;t do that cause it seems like that is sort of gaming Google a bit and that most admin&#8217;s would just delete the comment because they see that you are gaming the system.  What are your thoughts?  </p>
<p> Like I said, I am new and just learning so any insight you could provide would be helpful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
